GET ACTIVE
Watch Coalfinger
Watch our 007 spoof Coalfinger and share it with your friends to spread the word about the menace of coal.
Offshore wind boom to provide 25% of electricity and 70,000 jobs by 2020
Posted by jossc on 8 January 2010.
Wind power in the UK has just been given a massive shot in the arm with several large-scale new offshore projects in the pipeline. The Crown Estate - which is the lucky owner of the seabed around the British Isles - is awarding contracts for a vast programme of wind farm construction which will significantly improve our renewable energy capacity, not to mention creating thousands of jobs.
Construction is planned to start in 2014, and by 2020 these new projects will provide up to 32GW - the same as around 18 new coal-fired power stations, and a full 25 per cent of the UK's electricity demand. This will make a major contribution to the UK's EU commitment to produce 15 per cent of our energy from renewable sources by 2020 (we're only at around 2 per cent at the moment so there's a long way to go).
And in these difficult financial times, the opportunity to create new jobs is always a big plus point, especially ones in a growing green economy. According to the British Wind Energy Association (BWEA), our wind industry currently employs around 5,000 people. This new £100 billion programme should create tens of thousands more jobs in project planning, fabrication, installation, operations and maintenance activities.
Opponents of wind technology often complain that we can’t rely on wind because, by its very nature, it’s a variable resource. Crucially these new offshore farms will be evenly spread around the coastline of our windy island, smoothing out much of the fluctuation. The National Grid’s experts are confident that fluctuating wind power can be managed in the system. The development of smart grids in Britain and, if it happens, the European 'supergrid' announced this week should also make the management of fluctuating renewable energy supplies much easier.
So this is great news, both for the climate and for British workers. As Greenpeace UK boss John Sauven points out: “Our country is home to some of the best engineers, mechanics and construction professionals in the world. Their expertise will be crucial if we are to harness the massive potential that new technologies like offshore wind have to offer.
“The Government’s role is clear. Train and equip Britain’s workforce to ensure that the thousands of jobs which will be created are filled by workers in Britain, and provide the economic certainty investors need to complete these projects on time and on budget. The economic and environmental benefits are huge, but unless we make the most of this momentous opportunity, others will.”
Greenpeace briefing: opportunities and challenges for offshore wind power in Britain »
Dominic Lawson in Sunday Times
Dominic Lawson's column in today's Sunday Times (10th January) 'Brrrr, the thinking on climate is frozen solid' makes interesting albeit disheartening reading.
A perusal of the readers comments on this article, (I suggest you read the most recommended) is an interesting barometer of public opinion on tackling global warming and renewable energy.
Sadly, it seems as well as addressing the threat of climate change we have to address public opinion.
I'm off now to switch to a green supplier for my electricity because, regardless if it's a little more expensive in the short term, for the sake of my 20 month old daughter it's worth it!
Jon
re: Dominic Lawson in Sunday Times
It's interesting that otherwise intelligent people have such a problem distinguishing between 'weather' and 'climate', and fail to grasp that the disruption in weather patterns caused by climate change implies less predictability and more extreme events.
For an insight into the relationship between weather and climate read:
http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/climate/climate-weather-and-arctic-blasts-20100112
As for Dominic Lawson's thinking on the subject, it's confused, wooly and basically just wrong. His comment that:
"The vast programme of wind turbines for which the bills are now coming in will not, by the way, avert the energy cut-offs declared last week by the national grid. Quite the opposite: as is often the case, the recent icy temperatures have been accompanied by negligible amounts of wind. If we had already decommissioned any of our fossil-fuel power stations and replaced them with wind power, we would now be facing a genuine civil emergency rather than merely inconvenience. "
like most of what he says, doesn't bear close examination. As this article above clearly states the National Grid's own scientists and engineers completely refute what he is saying, and confirm that these new large offshore wind facilities can consistently provide 25% of our power needs.
If they are happy, and the wind farms are out at sea and out of his sight - what's he complaining about? With N Sea oil and gas running out, we need to diversify our energy supplies. Wind gives us 3 massive advantages:
Oh, and just for good measure it makes an important contribution to tackling the biggest problem the world faces today - climate change.
In other words, it's total no-brainer. Bit like Mr Lawson, really...