TAKE ACTION
Latest videos
Blog archives
Blogroll
- Barkingside 21
- BusinessGreen blog
- Celsias
- Conscious Comment
- The Daily (Maybe)
- DeSmogBlog
- Don't Bomb Iran
- Eco-chick
- Eco-geek
- Ecomonkey
- Environmental Blog
- Environmental Graffiti
- George Monbiot
- Gristmill
- Greenpeace Australia Pacific
- Greenpeace: Climate Rescue
- Greenpeace: Making Waves
- Greenpeace New Zealand
- New Scientist
- Nuclear Reaction
- Plane Stupid
- Real Climate
- Skeptical Science
- The Sietch
- TreeHugger
Nuclear Reaction
2009 in pictures
Posted by jossc on 8 January 2010.
It's been another big year for Greenpeace around the world, culminating in the Copenhagen climate summit. Take a look back on some of our best images and stories from 2009.
Nuclear companies in cash crisis?
Posted by jossc on 17 June 2009.

A new report out today casts doubt on the ability of the nuclear industry to deliver its promised new reactors.
French companies EDF and Areva, who are at the forefront of the new worldwide reactor design and building programme, have been making serious investments in foreign markets where they hope to build new reactors, including here in the UK. As a consequence they are heavily in debt. Read more »
New Finnish reactor lacks 'a proper design that meets the basic principles of nuclear safety'
Posted by jossc on 14 May 2009.
The OL3 European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) project, under construction at Olkiluoto, Finland, is seen by the nuclear industry as the blueprint for a new generation of reactors they'd like to see being built all over the world.
Already well behind schedule and way over cost, serious problems were uncovered two days ago in the primary coolant pipes, only a week after documents leaked to Finnish media revealed that designs for the most vital and fundamental part of this untried and untested nuclear reactor - the safety systems - are still not yet in place.
Read more »New nuclear sites: have your say
Posted by jossc on 1 May 2009.

Proposed sites of new nuclear power stations. See below for key
Do you live in the vicinity of one of these 11 locations, which are being proposed as potential sites for new nuclear power stations? Happy about it? If not, then you've got less than three weeks to read and respond to the information provided by the companies bidding to develop each site as part of the government's 'consultation' process.
Not only that, but if you take the information contained in the 'have your say' guide on the government's website, you'll run the risk of being seriously misled over issues as fundamental as how much nuclear actually contributes to the UK's energy mix, and how and where the spent fuel will be disposed of.
Read more »Government knocks the wind out of renewables
Posted by nathan on 28 April 2009.

Two breaking stories neatly illustrate the flawed logic which still lurks at the heart of UK energy policy. First up is that German energy utility RWE's bid to build a new nuclear plant near Kirksanton in Cumbria will mean dismantling an existing wind farm on the site. While at the other end of the country, 600 workers at the Vestas Blades wind turbine factory on the Isle of Wight could be facing redundancy.
Read more »Quelle horreur – the plots thickens around the EDF scandal
Posted by nathan on 18 April 2009.
On Tuesday morning I received a call from my colleagues in Paris inviting me to pop over and see them as they had had some worrying news that they needed to share. So the next day, long before the sun was stirring and the local rooster was warming his vocals, I was on my way to St Pancras heading for a lunchtime appointment in 20th Arrondissement. It turns out that the French state owned energy company Electricité de France (EDF), who have allegedly been spying on Greenpeace since 2004, are more involved in the scandal than it initially appeared.
Read more »Meaningless French letters
Posted by niall on 14 April 2009.

Niall: taking the wind out of EdF's sails?
Fellow press officers Graham and James have already written about how they spend their days. I spend mine in a similar way. So now I've got to pad this piece out for another hundred words or so.
Which is pretty much the opposite of what I normally do.
Many of the campaigners here hold a wealth of knowledge and expertise in their tip-top brains. I then take their carefully considered words, which are based on scientific evidence, honed by years of expertise, and butcher it into a couple of sentences that a fourteen-year-old should understand. So, rather than padding out, I, erm, pad in.
But some people might already know that. Not because they've got a fine feeling for the life of a press officer, thanks to James and Graham. But because they're spying on us.
Read more »It's official: nuclear recycling plant is a staggering waste of taxpayers' money
Posted by jossc on 7 April 2009.
Backers of the controversial MOX plant at Sellafield, which promised to turn toxic waste into a useable fuel that could be sold worldwide, had claimed the plant would make a profit of more than £200m in its lifetime, producing 120 tonnes of recycled fuel a year.
But an investigation published in today's Independent newspaper reveals what the government has been trying to keep secret - that technical problems and a dearth in orders has meant it has produced just 6.3 tonnes of fuel since opening in 2001.
Since building work began in the 1990s the plant has absorbed over £1 billion in public subsidies - money which could have been far better invested in developing renewable energy projects.
Read more »EDF caught spying on Greenpeace in France
Posted by jamie on 2 April 2009.
With echoes of that fantastic/horrifying nuclear thriller Edge Of Darkness (don't wait for the film, see the original TV series), energy giant EDF has been busted for spying on our colleagues at the Greenpeace in France.
Five people have been indicted by the French courts, including two EDF security executives, a computer expert and the head of a private investigation firm. The charge: attempting to hack into Greenpeace computer systems in France.
Read more »Brown's mixed signals on nuclear
Posted by jossc on 20 March 2009.
Martin Butcher gives his reaction to the Prime Minister's recent policy speech on the future of Britain's nuclear arsenal. Martin is a consultant on international security issues and a Nato policy analyst for the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy. This article first appeared in Comment is Free on 17th March.
Gordon Brown's speech today at Lancaster House exposed a fundamental contradiction at the heart of government policy on non-proliferation. The prime minister sees the importance of a world free of nuclear weapons because it is the only way of guaranteeing "that our children and grandchildren will be free from the threat of nuclear war". And yet, his government is committed to the development of a new generation of submarine-based nuclear weapons to replace Trident, thus maintaining Britain's status as a nuclear weapons state for half a century.
Read more »

