Email Print

Coal: going, going, gone?

saynotodirtycoal1.jpg

It's been a long, difficult and wild ride at times, but an end to climate damaging carbon emissions from new coal power stations could be in sight at last. Finally, some politicians seem to have recognised that we can't cut our CO2 emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 AND keep pumping the stuff out of our power plants - hooray!

Last December the government announced a new energy bill that explicitly recognises this reality. So far so good - but (as you'll be shocked to discover) there's a problem. As yet the bill has no teeth - whilst it says that new power stations must be able to capture some of their emissions from the get go, it contains no guarantee that by 2025 all carbon emissions from coal must be captured, and that's the bit that really counts.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Will Ed make Britain a global leader on climate change?

coalsmoke.jpg

Ed Miliband today announced the details of his new coal consultation. While recognising the need to reduce emissions from coal-fired power stations, as promised, it places equal emphasis on maintaining a "diverse, secure energy mix". Read more »

Tags:
Email Print

Help save the climate: come to the Mili-band

Quit coal, save the climate

We've made some progress on the coal campaign lately, with Climate and Energy Minister Ed Miliband finally ruling out any new coal-fired power stations that don't capture a proportion of the carbon they emit. But that's not nearly enough to save the climate.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Must-watch video: Joss analyses government carbon capture and storage plans

Ed Miliband's announcement that no new coal-fired power stations will be built in the UK without carbon capture and storage technology included changed the coal playing field. Does this mean the campaign against new coal is over? Or is the devil in the detail? 

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

At last a glimmer of leadership on climate

Ed Miliband

It's certainly far from everything we've been asking for, but when Ed Miliband announced his new consultation on coal policy in the House of Commons this lunchtime it was clear that something had changed. For starters, E.ON isn’t going to get its way over Kingsnorth, at least not with its current plan.

Showing admirable signs of climate leadership in the face of resistance from Whitehall officials and his cabinet colleagues, the Energy and Climate Change secretary told MPs that no new coal-fired power stations would be built in Britain unless  equipped with at least some carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. In a key departure from previous policy, he said that from now on power companies planning to build new coal plants will be required to fit full CCS by 2025 at the latest, provided that the Environment Agency is convinced that the technology works. 

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Greenpeace hails 'signs of climate leadership' at last

But huge risks mean campaign continues
23 Apr 2009

Following today's announcement by Ed Miliband of new regulations for coal plants and the launch of a consultation on coal policy, Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said:

"At last Ed Miliband is demonstrating welcome signs of climate leadership in the face of resistance from Whitehall officials and cabinet colleagues. He is the first minister in twelve years to throw down the gauntlet to the energy companies and demand they start taking climate change seriously."

Greenpeace believes the key part of today's announcement is the requirement by power companies to capture and bury all the CO2 emissions from new coal plants by 2025 at the latest, if the Environment Agency states that CCS works – a radical departure from the policies of previous energy secretaries. This time last year energy issues were being decided by tired ministers in thrall to regressive civil servants. Now we see hints of real climate leadership.

John Sauven continued:

"Finally a cabinet minister has faced up to the massive threat coal poses to the climate, but we're not there yet. Very significant questions remain unanswered, with environmentalists concerned that emissions from coal could still be undermining Britain's climate efforts for years to come. For every tonne of carbon captured and buried from new coal plants before the 2020s, the Government seems happy to see three tonnes released into the atmosphere. Until there is a cast iron guarantee that new coal plants won't be allowed to pump out massive amounts of CO2 from day one, our campaign continues."

Questions that the consultation must answer are:

  • Will new coal plants be permitted to operate for a decade while still pumping three-quarters of their emissions into the atmosphere?
  • How will the Government ensure that, if CCS technology doesn't work, the UK won't be left with a legacy of new coal plants emitting huge amounts of CO2 at a time when we must be slashing emissions?
  • Will existing coal plants like Drax, which are slated to continue operation into the 2020s, be allowed to continue operating unabated despite their massive emissions?

Four CCS coal demonstration projects operating for 15 years before becoming fully CCS could still emit up to 275 million tonnes of CO2, according to the Greenpeace energy team (calculation available on demand). Greenpeace believes today's announcement will only be effective in ruling out climate-damaging emissions from coal if it is backed up with tough regulations that prevent the prospect of the energy companies building new highly-polluting coal plants with the odd small CCS experiment bolted onto the side. A new Kingsnorth that emits marginally less than it otherwise would have is still utterly inconsistent with claims that Britain leads the world on climate change.

Research by Poyry – Europe's leading independent energy experts – found that if Britain meets its renewables and energy efficiency targets, we won't need any coal or nuclear.

In December last year Lord Turner's Committee on Climate Change – in its advice to the Prime Minister – said no coal station (existing or newly built) should still be operating without full CCS beyond the early 2020s. Professor James Hansen, the NASA director widely recognised as the world's leading climate scientist, has said no coal station should be allowed to be built unless it has full CCS from day one.

Greenpeace supports the approach pioneered by Governor Schwarzenegger in California - an Emissions Performance Standard (EPS) applied to power stations that would limit the amount of CO2 produced per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated. Greenpeace advocates an initial EPS of 350g/Kwh which would rule out new unabated coal. The EPS would tighten over time to reflect developing technologies and demands by scientists that emissions peak in 2015 then reduce dramatically.

Sauven said:

"The Government should implement an Emissions Performance Standard so if CCS doesn't work, whatever takes its place is in line with the climate science."

Environmentalists have run a two year campaign against new highly-polluting coal plants, with attention focusing on E.ON's plans to build a new plant at Kingsnorth in Kent. The German utility submitted plans for a normal ‘unabated' plant, and came close to achieving consent from then-energy secretary John Hutton. Now those plans are regarded by government as untenable.

Six Greenpeace activists who shut down the existing plant at Kingsnorth and painted the Prime Minister's name on the chimney faced trial late last year but were acquitted after convincing a jury that the damage they did to the power station was justified in the face of the harm done to the planet by coal plants.

In today's Financial Times Scottish Power urged the Government to support a plan to 'retro-fit' CCS at the company's existing Longannet power station on the east coast of Scotland. Fitting CCS to such existing plants would negate the need to build new coal plants in order to demonstrate the potential viability of the technology. Nick Horler, the chief executive of Scottish Power, said: "There are over 50,000 fossil fuel plants worldwide, and if we can't do anything about retro-fitting them with carbon capture, then whatever we do with new build is largely irrelevant."

A full Greenpeace briefing on coal can be downloaded at: http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/files/pdfs/climate/caseagainstcoal200812.pdf

A timeline of recent developments in the coal debate can be found at: http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/coaltimeline

ENDS

Email Print

Video: Greenwash and spin over coal

Here's an interesting catch-up of the state of play with coal in the UK from Channel 4, including some wise words from our director John.

Here's an interesting catch-up of the state of play with coal in the UK from Channel 4, including some wise words from our director John.

Tags:
Email Print

Ed Miliband's statement on coal: Greenpeace reaction

22 Dec 2008

Reacting to comments in this morning's Financial Times interview with Ed Miliband, in which he says the government will not rule out new coal plants that don't capture and bury their emissions, Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said:

"Ed Miliband needs to immediately clarify his position on new coal plants. At the moment it looks he's chosen the week just before Christmas to slip out a deeply concerning new position on the totemic climate change issue of this decade. If that is the case then he will have rejected the pleas of the world's leading climate scientists and his own advisor, Lord Turner, who declared just a few weeks ago that we can't meet our climate targets by allowing new coal plants to pump out emissions for decades."

Miliband used his FT interview to attack the Conservative Party and its position on coal.

John Sauven continued: "Miliband is playing party politics with coal and climate change just days after he called for a huge people-powered movement on global warming. This is no way inspire action to tackle the most important issue of our time."

In September this year six Greenpeace volunteers were acquitted of causing criminal damage to the Kingsnorth smokestack after the jury accepted their claim that they acted in defence of the planet because coal plants are so polluting.

Scientists across the board - including NASA director James Hansen - have called for a moratorium on coal plants that don't have carbon capture fitted from the start. Greenpeace and other leading environmental NGOs have called for an emissions performance standard for power stations that would require them to emit no more than 350g of CO2 for every kilowatt hour of electricity generated.

ENDS

Greenpeace press office - 0207 865 8255

Email Print

Will the real Ed Miliband please stand up?

Coal power - no thanks!

Ed Miliband demonstrated the confusion at the of the heart of the government's energy and climate change strategies this morning when he refused to rule out new coal plants which don't capture and bury their emissions – just weeks after his own advisers warned there was no future for these power plants.

He attacked Conservative plans for the introduction of green standards for power stations that would rule out the dirtiest coal plants like E.ON's for Kingsnorth, as "knee jerk" and "not thought through". Apparently, he's happy to play party politics with coal and climate change, just days after he called for a people-powered movement on global warming. Hardly the way to inspire action on the most important issue of our time.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Clean coal - the reality

Clean coal technology like this is at work right now in a coal-fired power station near you

Clean coal technology like this is at work right now in a coal-fired power station near you

Energy companies putting in bids to run new coal-fired power stations have been quick to seize upon carbon capture and storage (CCS) as the ideal solution to their biggest problem - explaining why they're so keen to return to using the dirtiest fossil-fuel possible at a time when we need to cut CO2 emissions dramatically to reign-in climate change.

Read more »
Tags: