What you can do
TAKE ACTION
Nuclear Reaction
Jim Bohlen 1926 - 2010
Posted by jossc on 7 July 2010.

There's an old joke that you can walk into any bar in Vancouver and find somebody claiming to be a Greenpeace founder. If that somebody had been Jim Bohlen, however, then this claim would have been absolutely true. It is with very deep sadness, then, that we have learned of Jim's death on 5 July, 2010, at the age of 84.
Read more »
Greenpeace Submission to the Proposed Regulatory Justification decisions on new nuclear power stations: Consultation Document
Greenpeace Submission to the Proposed Regulatory Justification decisions on new nuclear power stations: Consultation Document.
Greenpeace's submission to the Consultation on the draft National Policy Statements for energy infrastructure
Greenpeace's submission to the Consultation on the draft National Policy Statements for energy infrastructure.
New Finnish reactor lacks 'a proper design that meets the basic principles of nuclear safety'
Posted by jossc on 14 May 2009.
The OL3 European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) project, under construction at Olkiluoto, Finland, is seen by the nuclear industry as the blueprint for a new generation of reactors they'd like to see being built all over the world.
Already well behind schedule and way over cost, serious problems were uncovered two days ago in the primary coolant pipes, only a week after documents leaked to Finnish media revealed that designs for the most vital and fundamental part of this untried and untested nuclear reactor - the safety systems - are still not yet in place.
Read more »Nuclear sites: have your say
Why the government’s 'Have Your Say' guide to new nuclear plants is seriously misleading, and the steps you can take to contribute to the consultation and effectively register your opposition to new nuclear build in your neighbourhood.
Meaningless French letters
Posted by niall on 14 April 2009.

Niall: taking the wind out of EdF's sails?
Fellow press officers Graham and James have already written about how they spend their days. I spend mine in a similar way. So now I've got to pad this piece out for another hundred words or so.
Which is pretty much the opposite of what I normally do.
Many of the campaigners here hold a wealth of knowledge and expertise in their tip-top brains. I then take their carefully considered words, which are based on scientific evidence, honed by years of expertise, and butcher it into a couple of sentences that a fourteen-year-old should understand. So, rather than padding out, I, erm, pad in.
But some people might already know that. Not because they've got a fine feeling for the life of a press officer, thanks to James and Graham. But because they're spying on us.
Read more »New nuclear reactor's waste is seven times more hazardous
Posted by jamie on 3 February 2009.
The waste from this EPR in Finland will be seven times more hazardous than existing nuclear reactors © Greenpeace/Cobbing
Thanks to Justin at Nuclear Reaction for allowing us to reproduce this scandalous story:
Following the French government's announcement that it wants to build a second EPR (European Pressurised Reactor) comes the news that the nuclear waste produced by this so-called state of the art reactor is far more dangerous than that of ordinary reactors.
Read more »Leaked legal documents say the government is open to challenges over new nuclear power
Posted by niall on 17 November 2008.
The government would have you believe that all is well in the world of nuclear power. That the path to building more of them in the UK is smooth and care-free.
It isn't. We know this because we're keeping a keen eye on the whole process. A very keen eye. And Greenpeace investigations have exposed that the path is not as smooth as the government will have you believe.
Legal advice from top lawyers says that the government's nuclear plans are open to a number of challenges, on a number of fronts, over a number of years.
Read more »

